Salvatore Caruso vs Tennys Sandgren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W W W L L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LHead To Head: Caruso 2 - 1 Sandgren
They have played 8 sets in total, with Caruso winning 4 and Sandgren winning 4. The last match between Caruso and Sandgren was at the Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva, 17-05-2021, First, Clay with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Salvatore Caruso | 2 |
| Tennys Sandgren | 1 |
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva(17-05-2021)
6
3
6
4
| Caruso | Stats | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 876 | Ranking | 740 |
| 76 | Highest Rank | 41 |
| 32 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 16 |
| 54% (420-357) | Career Total W/L | 56% (421-325) |
| $927,160 | Career Prize Money | $2,256,263 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Salvatore Caruso
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(2) 6-1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Tennys Sandgren
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
9
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Tennys Sandgren
50%
(
59 of
117)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
43 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 41 | Games Won | 39 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 23 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:20:46 | Average Match Time | 2:20:46 |
| 56% (162/287) | 1st Serve % | 58% (140/240) |
| 67% (109/162) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (104/140) |
| 52% (65/125) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (47/100) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 28% (7/25) |
| 37% (89/240) | Return Points Win % | 39% (113/287) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Salvatore Caruso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Salvatore Caruso
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Paolini
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Fausto Tabacco
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Michele Ribecai
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Vito Dell'Elba
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Salvatore Caruso
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Pietro Marino
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Diogo Marques
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (420/357) | Win/Loss | 56% (421/325) |
| 53% (954/863) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (993/786) |
| 51% (8787/8334) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8948/8222) |
| 55% (105/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (241/175) |
| 56% (256/199) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (93/83) |
| 44% (50/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (76/57) |
| 47% (9/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1514 | Aces Total | 4008 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1380 | Total Double Faults | 1355 |
| 1:21:3 | Average Match Time | 1:18:11 |
| 524.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 514.05 |
| 61% (25737/42403) | 1st Serve % | 61% (25668/42295) |
| 66% (17113/25737) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (18700/25668) |
| 50% (8378/16666) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8246/16625) |
| 43% (1882/4376) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1428/3756) |
| 40% (17293/42892) | Return Points Win % | 37% (15591/42108) |
| 48% (22/24) | Slam W/L | 44% (25/32) |
| 39% (11/17) | Masters W/L | 36% (12/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (27/40) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (38/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (212/196) | Challenger W/L | 56% (195/154) |
| 65% (148/80) | Futures W/L | 71% (151/62) |
| 54% (406/747) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (402/706) |
| 43% (9/21) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 46% (101/218) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (161/309) |
| 56% (135/242) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (110/236) |
| 87% (391/342) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (434/360) |
| 13% (391/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (434/74) |
| 20% (386/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (312/62) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
